This page looks at highest paying states for Animal Scientist through Careerclev's current salary model, built from the latest official BLS wage baseline. It shows which states lead on pay, how big the gap is after the top spot, and where job opportunities are most concentrated.
In practice, Minnesota currently leads at $156,557/year, while Missouri gives you a useful second benchmark at $135,098. That makes it easier to judge whether the leader is far ahead or part of a tighter upper tier.
📅 Updated April 2026📊 Modeled salary benchmarks🇺🇸 Animal Scientist · 12 markets ranked⏱ 12 min read
1
Minnesota
$157K est.
2
Missouri
$135K est.
3
Georgia
$130K est.
4
Iowa
$109K est.
5
New York
$99.1K est.
#1 State
Minnesota
$157K
Markets Ranked
12
top markets
Data Layer
State
Careerclev salary model
Top Employment
60
employment estimate
Advertisement
Advertisement
Highest Paying States for Animal Scientist: Full Ranking
If you're comparing the best states for animal scientist, Minnesota sits at the top of this 12-market ranking at $156,557 per year in Careerclev's current salary model. From there, the second spot belongs to Missouri at $135,098, which helps show whether the pay curve drops quickly or stays fairly tight after the leader. On entry-level pages, Careerclev uses lower wage percentiles as a transparent proxy for starting pay, because the public source data does not offer a clean entry-level field for every role.
1
Minnesota
60 employed · state market
High payData year 2024Varies
100% benchmark
$156,557
official baseline $157K
2
Missouri
N/A employed · state market
High payData year 2024Varies
vs #1
$135,098
official baseline $135K
3
Georgia
60 employed · state market
High payData year 2024Varies
vs #1
$129,937
official baseline $130K
4
Iowa
130 employed · state market
High payData year 2024Varies
vs #1
$108,523
official baseline $109K
5
New York
N/A employed · state market
High payData year 2024Varies
vs #1
$99,120.0
official baseline $99.1K
6
Texas
60 employed · state market
High payData year 2024Varies
vs #1
$95,286.0
official baseline $95.3K
7
Wisconsin
230 employed · state market
High payData year 2024Varies
vs #1
$90,455.0
official baseline $90.5K
8
Washington
40 employed · state market
High payData year 2024Varies
vs #1
$89,218.0
official baseline $89.2K
9
Pennsylvania
90 employed · state market
High payData year 2024Varies
vs #1
$87,483.0
official baseline $87.5K
10
Maryland
200 employed · state market
High payData year 2024Varies
vs #1
$83,434.0
official baseline $83.4K
11
Ohio
40 employed · state market
High payData year 2024Varies
vs #1
$69,925.0
official baseline $69.9K
12
Illinois
160 employed · state market
High payData year 2024Varies
vs #1
$68,723.0
official baseline $68.7K
What Animal Scientist Do
Before the pay ranking means much, it helps to understand the work itself. Animal Scientist salary markets are easier to compare when the underlying role is clear.
This role combines strong pay potential with a specific preparation path and day-to-day work profile.
Animal Scientist Salary Trend
This market ranking is local, but the longer pay direction behind animal scientist is easier to read from the national salary trend. That helps show whether the role is sitting on a stable long-run wage climb or just posting a short-term local spike.
Careerclev's current 2026 estimate applies an annual modeled growth rate of 6.5% from the last confirmed BLS benchmark year, using wage history and employment outlook where available.
2026·$99.8KEstimated
$63.5K
2020
$65.1K
2021
$69.4K
2022
$70.1K
2023
$88.0K
2024
$93.7K
2025*
$99.8K
2026*
Official Data
May 2024 BLS
2020–2026 trend (est.)
↑ 57.2%
Forecast method
Trend + outlook model
* 2024–2026 values are modeled estimates extending from the last confirmed BLS benchmark. The last confirmed BLS figure ($88.0K, 2024) is extended with recent wage trend history, employment outlook, and tech-market signals where available, then replaced when official data is published.
Advertisement
Entry-Level Pay Signals
A high median salary only tells half the story. What matters for career planning is where starting pay actually lands. Because BLS does not publish a clean entry-level label for every role, Careerclev uses lower wage percentiles as a transparent proxy. Minnesota shows an estimated early-career pay signal of $92,995.0, compared with a long-run median of $156,557. In turn, that gap gives a better feel for both long-run upside and how quickly a role starts rewarding experience.
Job
Entry Proxy
Median Salary
Prep Path
Typical Education
Minnesota
$92,995.0
$156,557
Varies
Education path varies by employer
Missouri
$55,985.0
$135,098
Varies
Education path varies by employer
Georgia
$53,422.0
$129,937
Varies
Education path varies by employer
Iowa
$79,430.0
$108,523
Varies
Education path varies by employer
New York
$85,679.0
$99,120.0
Varies
Education path varies by employer
Texas
$80,802.0
$95,286.0
Varies
Education path varies by employer
Wisconsin
$75,267.0
$90,455.0
Varies
Education path varies by employer
Washington
$68,371.0
$89,218.0
Varies
Education path varies by employer
Jobs With Strong Demand
Pay ceilings matter more when the local labor market is deep enough to generate real openings. In Animal Scientist, Wisconsin combines a salary of $90,455.0 with roughly 230 employed workers, which makes it one of the more accessible high-pay options on this list. By contrast, some specialties rank higher on salary but operate as narrower niches where openings are harder to find and entry paths are longer.
Very Deep Market
Wisconsin
$90,455.0
230 employed
Training path varies in a varies pathway.
Very Deep Market
Maryland
$83,434.0
200 employed
Training path varies in a varies pathway.
Strong Market
Illinois
$68,723.0
160 employed
Training path varies in a varies pathway.
Strong Market
Iowa
$108,523
130 employed
Training path varies in a varies pathway.
Strong Market
Pennsylvania
$87,483.0
90 employed
Training path varies in a varies pathway.
Strong Market
Minnesota
$156,557
60 employed
Training path varies in a varies pathway.
Salary vs Employment
The highest-paying job is not always the largest market, and that distinction changes the practical calculus. Minnesota leads on salary at $156,557, while Wisconsin supports roughly 230 workers locally, a useful sanity check before committing to a long training path for a role with limited local openings.
MinnesotaSOC 19-1011
$157K
60
MissouriSOC 19-1011
$135K
N/A
GeorgiaSOC 19-1011
$130K
60
IowaSOC 19-1011
$109K
130
New YorkSOC 19-1011
$99.1K
N/A
TexasSOC 19-1011
$95.3K
60
WisconsinSOC 19-1011
$90.5K
230
WashingtonSOC 19-1011
$89.2K
40
How to Choose a High-Paying Job Strategically
Salary rankings are a starting point, not a decision. In Animal Scientist, the gap between Minnesota at $156,557 and the early-pay signal from Minnesota at $92,995.0 shows why access, market size, and training timelines belong in the same conversation as the headline number. That is where this page becomes more useful than a simple ranking list.
1
Match salary to access realistically
A high median means little if there are only a handful of openings per year. Check the employment estimate alongside the salary. A role with 230 workers in Animal Scientist is fundamentally easier to enter than one with a few hundred.
2
Factor in education and licensure timelines
Some of the highest-paying roles on this list sit in prep bands such as Varies and often pair that with expectations like education path varies by employer. Build that timeline into your planning before targeting the salary ceiling.
3
Separate entry pay from long-run upside
The entry proxy column in this guide gives you an early-career anchor. A role that starts at $92,995.0 and scales to $156,557 offers a very different career arc than one that starts and peaks near the same figure.
4
Check the work before chasing the pay
Compare the day-to-day work with the training path before you commit. A role can rank highly on pay and still be a poor fit if the work itself does not match the kind of problems, environment, or responsibilities you want.
Advertisement
Related High-Pay Pages
These related pages are the most useful next steps from this ranking. They keep the same high-pay context for Animal Scientist, then branch into nearby market views and role-specific pages such as Wisconsin and Illinois. If this page answers the pay question but not the career question, start here.
High-pay rankings are most useful when you read them alongside the core salary guide, the career entry path, and a few nearby role comparisons. That turns this page from a ranking into a better decision route for animal scientist.
These questions cover the practical parts of the ranking: how entry pay is estimated, why wage fields sometimes differ by source, and how to compare the top salary with the real size of the job market.
Which state pays the most for Animal Scientist?▼
Minnesota currently leads this animal scientist ranking at $156,557 per year in Careerclev's current salary model, built from the latest available BLS OEWS wage baseline.
Is the entry-level pay data directly from BLS?▼
Not exactly. BLS publishes wage percentiles rather than experience-level labels, so Careerclev uses the 25th percentile (or the low-end wage where available) as an entry-pay proxy. It is a transparent approximation, not a direct label.
Which state pays the most for Animal Scientist?▼
Minnesota currently leads this animal scientist pay ranking at $156,557 per year, with an employment estimate of 60. Use the salary gap and employment depth together when comparing the strongest markets.
What kind of preparation does Animal Scientist usually require?▼
Animal Scientist is currently tagged as varies in the O*NET prep model. The most common education signal is education path varies by employer, while the training path is described as training path varies.
Does the top-paying market also have the deepest employment base?▼
Not always. Wisconsin may support a deeper employment base than the #1 salary market, which can make them more practical despite a lower pay ceiling.
How should I compare salary with accessibility?▼
Use the ranking salary, entry-pay proxy, employment estimate, and preparation path together. The best target is usually the role that balances strong pay with a realistic path in.
Can a lower-ranked job be a better target than Minnesota?▼
Yes. A lower-ranked role can be the better choice if it has a shorter prep path, stronger entry pay, more openings, or a work profile that fits you better than Minnesota.
Why do some high-paying roles look hard to enter?▼
Many top-paying roles sit behind longer training, licensing, or related-experience requirements. That is why Careerclev shows preparation signals next to salary instead of treating all high-paying jobs as equally accessible.
🔬
Data Sources & MethodologyRankings use Careerclev salary facts built from BLS OEWS wage data and extended through Careerclev's current salary projection model where applicable. National pages use U.S. aggregate data, state pages use state-level data, and city pages use the BLS metro dataset behind the largest-city public label. Category labels are derived from BLS Standard Occupational Classification (SOC) major group codes, while prep-path notes come from imported O*NET job-zone and career requirement data where available.